recognize. Thus, you probably shouldn't be citing Wikipedia. This is good advice for all tertiary sources such as encyclopedias, which are designed to

# Summary * Sneha Anne Philip, a 31-year-old physician, vanished in Lower Manhattan the night before the 9/11 attacks. * Her last confirmed sighting was at a department store across from the Twin Tow...

Points: 0 | Comments: 0 | Author: bonoboTP

Wikipedia can be considered as an extreme form of a self-managing team, as a means of labour division. One could expect that this bottom-up approach, with the absense of top-down organisational contro...

often cite reliable secondary sources that vet data from primary sources. If the information on another Wikipedia page (which you want to cite as the

...

Points: 0 | Comments: 0 | Author: mjn

Wikipedia is a goldmine of information; not just for its many readers, but also for the growing community of researchers who recognize it as a resource of exceptional scale and utility. It represents ...

semi-automatically Wikipedia editing basics: Citing sources (part 1) (YouTube). Wikimedia Foundation. Wikipedia editing basics: Citing sources (part 2) (YouTube)

On Wikipedia, there used to a page with the name of "Allegations of genocide by Israel in the 2023 Hamas-Israel war" where it apparently documented the "genocidal intent" of Israel, Netanyahu, its fig...

Quantum simulation has emerged as a powerful framework for investigating complex many - body phenomena. A key requirement for emulating these dynamics is the realization of fully controllable quantum ...

not Wikipedia:Reliable sources or Wikipedia:Citing sources. Wikipedia is increasingly being used as a source in the world press. Articles citing Wikipedia

Hi there! Due to the Jeffrey Epstein and Epstein files situation, and due to the Trump administration's repeated forays with regard to it, **we've decided to make a megathread to direct all discussio...

We conducted a global comparative analysis of the coverage of American topics in different language versions of Wikipedia, using over 90 million Wikidata items and 40 million Wikipedia articles in 58 ...

works citing Wikipedia as a source. It excludes studies of Wikipedia, and non-academic works such as magazine and newspaper articles using Wikipedia as a

Hi there! As the situation in Venezuela continues to spiral, particularly with recent developments, **we've decided to create a megathread for people to discuss Venezuela or share related information...

With the rise of Wikipedia as a first-stop source for scientific knowledge, it is important to compare its representation of that knowledge to that of the academic literature. Here we identify the 250...

January 29, 2007: Court decisions citing Wikipedia proliferate Wikipedia Signpost, July 3, 2006: Wikipedia cited by the High Court of England and Wales

I frequently see people making comments on this subreddit and elsewhere about how they read an article on Wikipedia and now have a lot of doubt about the legitimacy of the subject. That’s by design....

The rise of Internet has made it a major source of information. Unfortunately, not all information online is true, and thus a number of fact-checking initiatives have been launched, both manual and au...

a Wikipedia article. For general information on creating references and citing sources on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Citing sources. Adding sources via

It's been a few days. The Casio F-91W still is an incredible watch. So, when was it released? Let's recap: The internet said it was 1991. Somebody figured out it was 1989, and started a discussion o...

Over the past 20 years, Wikipedia has gone from a rather outlandish idea to a major reference work, with more than 60 million articles across all languages, including nearly 7 million in English [Wiki...

point to detect unreliable sources which are cited by Wikipedia, but it does not answer whether it is appropriate to cite them. Due to the somewhat arbitrary

Source: [Kevin Hassett, Gov.-elect Mikie Sherrill and more | "Face the Nation" Full Broadcast - Nov. 9, 2025 - YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zD_YjtF5CM&t=536s) > Well, let actually...

Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that anyone can edit. In this open model, some people edits with the intent of harming the integrity of Wikipedia. This is known as vandalism. We extend the framewo...

views that have appeared in those sources are covered (). If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

**TL;DR:** This selloff wasn't based on reduced ChatGPT citations. It was linked to political news (**Charlie Kirk** **RIP** → **Revenge of the 🌈 Bears** → **"Antifun"** (I don't want to end up...

Wikipedia is the largest online encyclopedia: its open contribution policy allows everyone to edit and share their knowledge. A challenge of radical openness is that it facilitates introducing biased ...

the original source and the summary and finds both helpful, it is good practice to cite both sources together (see Citing medical sources for details)

Reminder that rule 4 exists, don't go "brigading or otherwise interfering with other subreddits" Source, quite the interesting read: [Racial differences in homicide rates are poorly explained by econ...

We present, visualize and analyse the similarities and differences between the controversial topics related to "edit wars" identified in 10 different language versions of Wikipedia. After a brief revi...